Subject Referenced
Who or what is the main subject of the title. Titles can center the politician themselves, their opponent, a policy issue, or a third party like a witness or agency head.
Self-referencing titles struggle on YouTube because viewers don't yet care about you — they care about the topic. Opponent-referencing titles tap into existing search interest and tribal engagement. Policy-centered titles attract issue-motivated viewers who tend to watch longer.
Each value below shows two numbers when available: Regular/Shorts is the effect on a typical video, and Top 10% is the effect on videos in the top 10% of views (from a quantile regression). Use the Top 10% column to see factors that disproportionately help videos that go big.
Bipartisan
Regular +5% Shorts +11% Top 10% -30% not significant p = 0.389 · vs. average
Real examples from the dataset
Institution
Regular +5% Shorts +12% Top 10% +3% not significant p = 0.445 · vs. average
Real examples from the dataset
Opponent
Regular +5% Shorts +2% Top 10% +16% not significant p = 0.641 · vs. averageThe title centers a political adversary — an opposing politician, party, or figure. Leverages the opponent's name recognition and viewer interest in conflict.
Real examples from the dataset
Self
+0% views not significant p = 1.000 · vs. averageThe title centers the politician as the main subject. Common on official channels but can feel self-promotional to YouTube viewers who don't know the politician.
Real examples from the dataset
Policy
+0% views not significant p = 1.000 · vs. averageThe title centers a specific policy, bill, or issue rather than any individual. Attracts viewers searching for information on the topic.
The $35 Insulin Cap: What It Actually Means for You
Third Party
+0% views not significant p = 1.000 · vs. averageThe title centers someone other than the politician or a direct opponent — a witness, agency head, expert, or constituent. Often used in hearing clips.
Watch This Veteran Tell Congress What VA Hospitals Are Really Like
Other
+0% views Top 10% +61% not significant p = 1.000 · vs. average
Nobody
-1% views Top 10% -11% not significant p = 0.968 · vs. average
Real examples from the dataset
Constituent
Regular -9% Shorts -16% Top 10% -14% SIGNIFICANT p = 0.036 · vs. average