content Factor

Names a Target

Whether the video explicitly criticizes a named person, group, or institution — a named opponent, 'billionaires', the named administration — rather than speaking generically.

Named conflict is the strongest engagement primitive in political video. This binary separates real named-target attacks from generic 'the other side' talk, which behaves differently in the algorithm.

Regular Videos
-5%
trend only
Shorts
+40%
solid pattern
Top 10% Video
+15%
solid pattern

Average Video is the effect on a typical video. Top 10% Video is the effect on the videos that broke out (top decile of views) — so you can see whether a factor helps most videos a little, or pushes the top performers much higher.

When present

The video attacks a named person, group, or institution.

Example

The Trump administration is dismantling the EPA — and they know exactly what they're doing.

When absent

No named target is criticized.